NEO-Mimesis

May, 2019




"Even if there are various social attributes that affect people, such as geography, race, culture, technology, and ideology, if we observe the history process from the perspective of the instinct of the human heart, we will find that the logic of using time does not hold, the so-called "prehistoric" There is no essential difference between human beings and "contemporary". Different objects are only the materialized representation of human desires, and the forms presented in different time periods are different. The trend of human history has not become clear because of the appearance of these objects. It is clear that human beings as individuals do not undergo essential changes because of the emergence of "civilization."
-
即使存在地域、種族、文化、技術、意識形態等影響人的各種社會屬性,如果從人內心「本能」的角度觀察歷史的進程,就會發現用時間這條邏輯並不成立,所謂的「史前」與「當代」對於人並沒有本質上的區別,不同物件只是人類慾望的實體化呈現,且在不同時間段呈現的形態不同而已,人類歷史的走向也並沒有因為這些物件的出現而變得清晰明朗,人作為個體並沒有因為「文明」的出現而產生本質變化。

-

WORDS not only as an end also as a new beginning.

Through the imagination of words and the shuttle between the past and the future, we will find that the only constant is the needs of human subjects. The correspondence between form and function, the composition of rules and patterns of the objects and characters. Archaeology infers the relationship between the material and the immaterial through various fragments. In the era when images and words expression have not yet been separated, how can we rule out that nonlinearity is an article of reading?

Here, the words as the only remnant of a previous civilization, at the same time, will also be an important reference for the undeniable opening of the next civilization.

-
藉由對文字的想像,穿梭在過去與未來之間,我們會發現唯一不變的是人為主體的需求。形式與功能的互相對應、物組成與文字組成的規律及章法。考古藉各式碎片反推著物質及非物質間的關聯性。在圖像與文字尚未分野的年代裡,我們怎麼能排除非線性式閱讀的文章呢?在這裏,文字作為前一個文明的唯一留存,同時也將會是開啟下一個文明不可否認的重要參照。

 




 © 2021 by Wan-Ru Lee